Our approach
Define the work, its context, and the checks that matter. Your team reviews the picture, tests the pilot, and shapes what comes next.
The six-stage method
Six stages, with something your team can review at each step.
Walk through a real task: what happened, which information mattered, and where judgment was needed. Participants check the account.
A reviewed account of the work.
Link tasks, responsibilities, and permissions to sources. Define the context each task needs and the checks for gaps or conflicting information.
Work map and context requirements.
Examine rework and delays using Lean Six Sigma principles. Weigh value, effort, and risk before choosing manual, assisted, or automated work.
Priorities and their rationale.
Configure the agreed capabilities in Claude or another environment. Test that each task has the context it needs, respects permissions, and meets the acceptance criteria.
A pilot tied to the definition.
Practice real tasks. Check that people can find context, judge outputs, and report gaps. Use their feedback to refine the workflow.
Reviewed workflow and team guidance.
Trace changed sources and tools to affected tasks. Review feedback, test proposed updates, and release approved versions with named owners.
A review cycle with clear ownership.
People review the work at every stage.
Workflow Discovery & Pilot
Start with one workflow. Agree the context, improvement, and acceptance criteria, then build and review a focused pilot.
An evidence-linked map of tasks, sources, responsibilities, and exceptions.
Required context, permissions, checks, and priorities for the first build.
Results from real use and an agreed decision about what comes next.
The SYST3M platform
We define your organizational scaffold: a shared definition linking processes, capabilities, permissions, and evaluations to evidence.
Alongside it, a method to collect, validate, and maintain the context each task needs.
01 / Define
Processes · Capabilities
Permissions · Evaluations
Evidence-linked. Rules for task context.
02 / Make available
03 / Put to work
Claude or another environment
Implemented through components and adapters.
Evidence & evaluation→Team review→Versioned updates
One environment can be enough. Updates follow team review.
Start with a focused pilot or the service your team needs.
Explore our servicesBefore we begin
Yes. Claude can help design and implement the system. Other environments can use adapters to the same definition and context. We agree the tools and access around your needs.
Employees review the map, check context, test the pilot, and shape training through feedback.
Owners review changed sources and feedback, test the effects on relevant tasks, and approve a new version before it guides work.
Start a conversation
Tell us about the work, what you’ve tried, and where your team gets stuck. We’ll explore a useful place to begin.